Front PagePage TwoRecent OfferingsWeekly MagazineHoroscopesSubscribe!Feedback
Saturday, May 6, 2006 | Not about those USB cables..

WELL after a week of daily horoscopes plus all the regular ones plus a few extra ones here and there, plus Astrology Secrets, I've said just about everything I have to say about the astrology of this weekend. I was planning a blog last night on the many different kinds of USB cables that exist, but thought the better of it. Better to say nothing than bring up a subject like that. However, I am fascinated by the USB-A to Ethernet that's in my collection. But that's as far as I'm going.

As for a potentially more important subject, the discussion of Sept. 11 is pretty vocal at the moment, though this may be an illusion of the tempest in my inbox. However, based on Mandy's C-Span blog (see below) I don't think so. A couple of nights ago, in response to a letter from a reader, I read through much of my coverage of the Sept. 11 astrology going back to October 2001 and was surprised how cautious I've been in stating what I really feel about these charts and why -- particularly the 8:46 am chart linked below.

But I do remember palpably the feeling of fear those first days and weeks -- that if you failed to snap to attention and salute the flag you would be arrested for sedition. Mr. Bush was elevated to the level of a demigod. Anyone who dared to question the newborn national mythology was a kind of instant heretic. Even The Onion managed to make its coverage mock-patriotic. Remember the woman who, after giving blood and donating to the Red Cross, didn't know what to do, so she baked a flag cake?

However, I was aware the whole story was going to come apart and consequently saved dozens of newspapers from the first days to preserve some vestige of the 'original story' on paper. What has come out in the subsequent four-and-half years vindicates the chart. Indeed, the chart pointed right to the real issues, which Michael Moore has covered better than anyone else in the mainstream media. And I am getting a sense that the issue is ready for discussion. Every salient fact is already established; there are reasons to question every stated fact in the 'official version' of events, starting with four hijacking teams batting 1000 within a 45 minute period, to the fact that relatively minor damage in two different solid steel and concrete towers caused them both to implode on their footprints instantaneously within a short time.

We then have the mystery of why WTC 7, a 40-story skyscraper, just collapsed around 5 o'clock that afternoon. It was not hit by an airplane. It just collapsed on its footprint. As I sit here typing this, it occurs to me that many people are not going to believe it's true -- but you can find it reported hundreds of places, you can watch the video, and you can track many discussions of just this one issue.

Let's start over on the chart. Here it is.

http://planetwaves.net/chart.php?c=911

Here are the minor planets from Tracy's page: http://snipurl.com/q3ov

Here are the secondary progressions, for Saturday. Take a look at the New Moon that's coming in the progressed chart. Take a look at that Jupiter rising.

http://planetwaves.net/chart.php?c=911-progr