|
Planet Waves | May 23, 2005 In the 70's Adele Davis was the eating guru with her book, Lets Eat Right to Keep Fit ... and Francis Moore Lappé, with her Diet for a Small Planet, gave us a real heads-up, as we'd already been lulled into an easy complacency with whatever the grocer waxed, polished, and wrapped in saran. We'd already succumbed to the convenience of picking up a burger or chicken or whatever, rather than plan a meal, or worry about its nutritive value, at the end of a long day. Doctors of that era [and, sadly, still] gave us very little information about nutrition as they didn't believe it overly important in determining our health -- a look at the new lobbying-inspired Food Pyramid shows you that we still don't put the health of the public ahead of profit and special interests. We had no idea how MUCH of an emergency there was thirty-or-so years ago, but at least these writers gave us ideas about what foods to combine for complete nutrition and how they effected our bodies. It was years after that period that we began to hear what pesticides were doing to our produce -- and we wouldn't have, had children not been sickened by apple juice which caused a stir in the press [that was when the press was still trusted to deliver the news.] The lid popped off that issue ... and we began to favor organically grown foods, which became -- of course -- more expensive and prohibitive to low income families. Now they're just plain expensive ... to everybody. Ahhhh -- the good old days, when everything was simpler. Now we have a crisis in America's [and because of our influence, the world's] food source ... and it's not the produce we must eye skeptically, it's the seed that produced it. I have to emote [laugh/cry/rant/pick one or all] when I read about George Bush's "clone wars" -- he will likely veto a new proposed bill in the House and Senate on stem cell research. He is manic about cells in a petrie dish but ignores the real cloning problem ... genetically modified food. From an article [posted below] in Sundays lndependent/UK -- Rats fed on a diet rich in genetically modified corn developed abnormalities to internal organs and changes to their blood, raising fears that human health could be affected by eating GM food. The Independent on Sunday can today reveal details of secret research carried out by Monsanto, the GM food giant, which shows that rats fed the modified corn had smaller kidneys and variations in the composition of their blood. According to the confidential 1,139-page report, these health problems were absent from another batch of rodents fed non-GM food as part of the research project. The GM [genetically modified] possibilities began with a Supreme Court decision in the mid-90's that allowed for the patenting of life forms for commercialization. In 1989, modified soy comprised just 2 percent of the US soy market. By the year 2000 it reached 80 percent. By 1999, GM ingredients were to be found in 2/3 of all US processed food. The World Trade Organization is very pro-GM ... and it is constantly in battle with countries that refuse it's biologically transformed food. We do not label GM ingredients in this country -- most countries do ... some restrict or ban them completely. I could go off on this topic -- every "super-crop" we develop comes with a new "super-weed" that requires even more lethal poison to kill it. In a day and age when we're looking at the likelihood of super-virus's it would be nice to know that we had a decent immune system to give us a fighting chance, but ... you have to wonder; it didn't serve the rats immune's well in the expose, below. Every "super-food" we gobble down will create ... WHAT? And that is the question, of course. We know not what we do ... in pursuit of "profit." And those making the profit don't seem to care. I check out the "Most E-Mailed Photos" on my Yahoo page every morning -- for the last several days, the most e-mailed has been a picture of a two-headed, five-legged calf. Anomaly, you ask? Dear God, I hope so! But I'd like to know what they were feeding the mother -- it's not nice to fool with mothers. It's not nice to fool with Mother Nature! She bites back. Peace ~ Jude ps -- go to this link first, for creative fun on this topic -- the one's that follow aren't nearly as cute. Store Wars The Organic Rebellion lives! www.storewars.org Revealed: health fears over secret study into GM food Rats fed GM corn due for sale in Britain developed abnormalities in blood and kidneys http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_technology/story.jsp?story=640430 Biology Prof. Resigns Over Gvt. Use of Plant Research http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/06/142202 50 Harmful Effects of Genetically Modified Foods http://www.cqs.com/50harm.htm Eric Francis is on holiday. Jude, the editor of Political Waves, is standing in for his daily blog this week. You can subscribe to Political Waves (our all-politics news distribution list) for free at the link below. You'll receive between five and 10 news articles each day. You may write to Jude with your responses to her commentaries at moderator@planetwaves.net. Political Waves list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political_waves/ Planet Waves | May 20, 2005 We talk in worried tones about the pending civil war in Iraq ... but what about the one we're having right here in America -- in our families, in our churches, in our workplace. It's a struggle between religion and spirituality, between belief systems, between the "Letter of the Law" and the "Spirit of the Law." Religion is so deeply personal to all of us, it's no wonder we are at odds, all of us -- that is ALSO the reason it has no place in our government. You knew we'd have to get around to religion eventually. Sadly, we can't talk politics without discussing it ... we've let the Founders carefully-placed division between church and state crumble and now we've got a mess on our hands. The problem with that is that having a conversation with fundamentalist legislators throws a mixed non-political message ... no matter how often they tell those of us who don't worship as they do that we're "out of touch with what the public wants," they're kidding themselves. A good many of us don't speak the same language or have the same intention -- and we're never going to. At least under democratic process, we were all on the same page. The only people who seem to be on the same page these days are the Religious Right and the Islamic Right -- they're both ... doncha know ... "right." I was raised a Baptist, and was devoted up until my fifteenth year. There came a point when I discovered all the wonderful expressions of wisdom outside of my own religion and noticed that my church experience seemed to be less about that and more about micro-managing my thought process. As I began to explore those other sources of wisdom, I hit the big Fear Wall with my family and friends ... all those sources might be just fine to play with, they warned, but they weren't "right." There was only One Way to "right" -- and if I didn't tow that line, God would -- sadly, I suppose -- cut me out of His will. I'd cut my teeth on the notion that God loved me, that had always seemed pretty unconditional to me. That's what I took with me when I left the church ... that and all the questions that a careful study of Biblical scripture provoked. Religion, I decided, had too many rules and not enough answers. Jesus was the prototype "rule breaker" ... I mean, they strung him up for it -- I figured if he could leave the "traditional church," so could I. I began to look for a larger concept of the God who loved me. My journey took me to the discovery that God IS Love ... and so are we ALL. [Light Bulb!!!] It was at that point that I went "spiritual" ... and there was no turning back. "Spirituality is to religion as justice is to law," said Richard Gross. Ahhhh ... nuance, everywhere you look. I had to scratch my head when the polls started playing the Religion card during the election -- how many were church members, how many were "secular." Scuuuuuze ME -- who said it was "either/or?" I don't attend a specific church and I don't consider myself secular. And I'm not, by any stretch of the imagination, a member of the "Godless Left." I DO have permission from the Power I believe in to think for myself, though ... and I can't imagine a God that wouldn't expect that of me. You're on a spiritual path, of course, and thinking for yourself, if you're reading this. Astrology is NOT approved by the conservative Christian church, but it's a definite stop on the path to discovery. Astrology is the art of interpreting energies and phases of experience. I've always thought that was one of the perks -- to understand how transitory everything is, how things progress, how new options open as old ones close. It's not difficult to recognize some Grand Design in how the stars move and the energy shifts -- nothing about that seems random to me. Or ... you might conclude it entirely random, in your philosophy. That's the expansiveness of the spiritual path ... we are individually informed as we move along, exploring ourselves and our world. On that path, you don't NEED to be "right" ... it's a journey, not a destination. There are a lot of religious people out there who are spiritual, as well -- I've appreciated hearing from some of them lately. We might not agree on every "jot and tittle," but I respect their insights. I've posted some of their voices, below. "Religion is a set of social and political institutions, and spirituality is a private pursuit which may or may not take place in a church setting," proposes D. Patrick Miller. For me, spiritual practice is the experience of the Divine, with or without the formal context. I just think of it as ... life. It would appear that being religious [and we're talking about Christianity, here, because that is the driving force behind our political conversation in this nation] does not necessarily mean one will come to spirituality -- for instance, I doubt that you would hear two spiritual people having a serious discussion that starts out, "What would Jesus bomb?" There are many mainstream Christians who find that whole concept a betrayal of their belief system -- they are attempting to live their religion and they do not find that this current politicized version of Christianity contains the message of the Christ. For awhile, they only said, "George Bush doesn't speak for me." Now, they're beginning to speak for what they do believe ... and it's past time we heard from this mainstream majority. They are, mostly, too well-mannered to Shout ... but they're raising their voices now. The nation needs to hear them before we all believe that God is the willing captive of one religious sect. A number of our Founding Fathers were Deists ... they believed that God had started the whole thing off with a bang but wasn't interested in the outcome. Very few of them had a good opinion of religion. This may be what prompted George Washington to state that, "The United States of America should have a foundation free from the influence of clergy." The Constitution reflects that agreement between them in it's declaration that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion." So, no laws have been made, granted -- but the amount of deference to fundamentalist Christianity in this country has been stunning. The day that George Bush linked the words "terrorism" and "crusade" together we all knew where we were going ... and how it would play. We're in a holy war now against "evil" ... but the interpretation of "evil" is fluid, these days. For instance, Iran is, but Uzbeckistan isn't. Selective sight, in Bushworld. That's the problem with open-ended concepts like "good" and "evil" ... who decides? In the hands of a president, I'd like to see a LOT of humility to go with that power ... but, well... sigh. And there's no doubt that for at least a portion of our population, "Onward Christian Soldiers" is playing in the background, while once again the church asserts that the Judeo/Christian God is better than those other One's, whoever they might be -- and in THIS century, we've got the bombs to prove "might makes right." Except of course, it doesn't ... you don't "war for peace;" mutually exclusive concepts. And so slowly it dawns on us that peace may not be the intention ... and that's where the Bush administration does it's professed religion a disservice -- Christianity suffers a big, global black eye in his hands. We've seen a lot of "smiting" in the tradition of an Old Testament Yahwe throwing thunderbolts, but how do we reconcile the actions of this government to the New Testament declaration that Jesus is the "Prince of Peace?" If by the very tenents of the Christian faith, Christ is the messenger for a new dispensation of the Law of Love ... and the political machine of the moment is completely and unequivocally "Christian" -- why are people dying from war and disease and famine while we do nothing to stop it and often, much to promote it? Why are the poor and underprivileged denied opportunity and decent wages? Why is child welfare funding constantly shrinking? Why are unfair business practices allowed to touch the lives of every one of us, here and abroad? Why is our earth being polluted and spoiled to fill the pockets of a few? Why are people being tortured and humiliated at our hands? Why do we continue to support dictatorships and nations that deny their own people civil liberties? It seems to me our government was a lot more "moral" before it got religion. It's failings were legion ... but not by design. Tolerance of our diverse backgrounds and beliefs, and the rule of law that denied the government body a religious preference, gave us a feel for the whole of humanity, not just the "special ones." Being "special" means that the guy who doesn't join you in your specialness, ain't. No matter how you rationalize it, being "special" is too great an ego-seduction for a mere mortal ... that is why the great religions always pound away at the practice of humility and charity and service and gentleness. Of all the "tests of power," the spiritual is the most fraught with peril. I feel sorry for the Democrats these days -- their job is a lot like dealing with the folks who show up at your door on a Saturday morning when you're in your bathrobe and want to tell you their version of the "good news." I'm always interested in good news, of course -- but ... you know ... you just can't have any kind of conversation with people who are sure they're "righter" than you can ever hope to be. When there's only one version of "right" available, you just end up having to shut the door in their face. And that's the tone that has stopped our legislative process cold. "Ethical existence [is] the highest manifestation of spirituality," said Albert Schweitzer. It may indeed be time for each of us to discover what we believe, to hash that out with the people we know and love, to go to the next level of our religious and spiritual understanding. But that should never have been allowed to spill over into our government process. The Founders were correct in their initial assessment -- democracy does not do well under religious inclination ... it may in fact cease to BE democracy. I think, if we're looking for ethical politics, we'll need to leave this religious experience we've been having behind. We need to slam the door on what tries to divide us in the name of God. Peace ~ Jude God's Own Party? Jim Wallis http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/051205H.shtml News is a commodity to be produced at full speed Sister Joan Chittister, OSB http://nationalcatholicreporter.org/fwis/fw051905.htm College ad to protest Bush visit http://washingtontimes.com/national/20050516-103313-9190r.htm Putting Bush's religious crusade against terrorism into historical context -- BuzzFlash interview: James Carroll http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?itemid=19076 Eric Francis is on holiday. Jude, the editor of Political Waves, is standing in for his daily blog this week. You can subscribe to Political Waves (our all-politics news distribution list) for free at the link below. You'll receive between five and 10 news articles each day. You may write to Jude with your responses to her commentaries at moderator@planetwaves.net. Political Waves list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political_waves/ Planet Waves | May 19, 2005 Short and sweet, this time... Today, as our Senators exchanged heated words and Bill Frist came closer than ever to pulling the pin on the "nuclear option" ... as media went crazy over the Newsweek retraction and the White House response ... as our generals gave us a new and grim assessment of the situation in Iraq ... as the US Air Force played with the notion of space weapons dubiously named "Rods from God" that will potentially trigger a new nuclear arms race ... where was our beloved leader? Why on the stump, of course -- pitching his Social Security program in Milwaukee. Read that: beating a dead horse. I offer the following in response -- How the GOP will Destroy Itself By DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER http://www.counterpunch.org/ike05182005.html A letter to his brother, Milton, written November 8, 1954: Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things. Among them are H. L. Hunt (you possibly know his background), a few other Texas oil millionaires, and an occasional politician or business man from other areas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid. ++ Hmmmmmmmm... Peace ~ Jude Eric Francis is on holiday. Jude, the editor of Political Waves, is standing in for his daily blog this week. You can subscribe to Political Waves (our all-politics news distribution list) for free at the link below. You'll receive between five and 10 news articles each day. You may write to Jude with your responses to her commentaries at moderator@planetwaves.net. Political Waves list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political_waves/ Planet Waves | May 18, 2005 OK -- remember that movie, While You Were Sleeping, where the girl who works at the ticket counter of the train falls in love with a stranger and then saves him from being run over by the train but he goes into a coma and the family thinks they're engaged and while the guy is in the hospital for weeks [gasp for air!] she falls in love with the family and especially the brother and then the guy wakes up and thinks he has amnesia but accepts the notion that they're engaged and just as they're being married ['nother gasp!] she backs out and tells the brother the truth and he says he loves her too ... and there's a happy ending? Well, look what happened while we were sleeping. I doubt if there's a happy ending -- I don't even know where my birth certificate IS. They Really Are Watching You Ready for your own all-new, sinister ID card, courtesy of Homeland Security? Shudder Mark Morford Wednesday, May 18, 2005 by the San Francisco Chronicle http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0518-27.htm Congress just passed it and Dubya has promised to sign it and the Homeland Security Department is giddier than Mel Gibson in a nail factory over it and marketers nationwide are salivating at the groin at the prospect of it, and the next big step toward America becoming an even more delightfully paranoid and draconian Big Brother wonderland has now officially been taken. It's called Real ID. It is, in short, a new and genetically mutated type of driver's license for all Americans, replacing your current license and replacing your Social Security card and replacing your sense of well being and privacy and humanity and part of a new, uniform, deeply sinister, national uniform card system whereby every person living and breathing in these paranoid and tense times shall henceforth be much more traceable and watchable given how we will all soon be required by law to carry this super-deluxe computerized ID card with us at all times, packed as it will be with more personal, digitized info about you than even your mother knows. Real ID is coming very soon. The legislation was passed with little outcry and zero debate by both House and Senate just last week because lawmakers snuck it into a massive $82 billion military spending bill, and therefore no one was really paying much attention and this is the way you get thorny disturbing culturally demeaning bills to pass without resistance from smart people who should know better. The new law will [...] require everyone to hand over not one, not two, but fully four types of documentation to renew their driver's license, such as a photo ID, a birth certificate, proof that their Social Security number is legit and something that validates their home address, like a phone bill. DMV employees will then have to verify the documents against giant teeming federal databases and store the documents and a digital photo of you in a database. Isn't that fun? Doesn't that sound gratifying? What's more, the card's design plan includes multiple openings for the Homeland Security Department to add on whatever features they deem necessary, with or without your knowledge, consent or who the hell cares what you think because we do what we want now please shut the hell up and quit asking questions. Computer (RFID) microchip? Likely. Digital fingerprint? Sure. Political affiliation? You bet. Web-site-visit log and religious affiliation and recent sperm count and arrest record and drug addictions and medical history and blood type and gender orientation and parent's/children's home address and number of personal blog posts calling Dr. Phil a "slug-licking ego-bitch charlatan" and your recent purchase history on shotathome.com? One guess. Make no mistake: Real ID, in short, takes us one happy step closer to a total surveillance state, where everyone is stamped and everyone is watchable and everyone is traceable and unless you live way, way off the grid out in the increasingly nonexistent hinterlands, you cannot escape the spazzy and twitchy and paranoid eye of Homeland Security. Remember the scenes in that surprisingly not-awful Tom Cruise flick "Minority Report" with the ubiquitous eye scanners, installed all over the near-future city? And as poor Tommy ran around like a maniac, little scanner machines installed by the gummint would read the eye pattern of every citizen as they walked around and the system could track anyone at any time no matter where they might wander and all the info was dumped into a huge database that was studied and cross-checked and manipulated by the CIA and FBI and Banana Republic? Real ID feels much like that, only not nearly as cool. Real ID is, as you might expect, giving civil liberties groups and immigrant-support groups the hives. State governors across the nation are none too happy, either, as implementation of the new law will cost each state hundreds of millions of dollars, but, of course, the bill provides zero federal funds to help. Such is the BushCo way. This is the funny thing. This is the sad thing. This is the terrifying thing. We have suffered one major debilitating act of terrorism in this nation and we have recoiled so violently, so rabidly, so desperately that we are still more than willing to give up whatever freedoms necessary in a vain and silly attempt to control chaos and plug every hole, when of course the nation is basically one giant hole to begin with. Of course, any good conspiracy theorist worth his secret underground bootleg Area 51 videos will tell you this sort of citizen-surveillance thing has been going on for years, decades, from spy satellites to GPS to all manner of phone tracking and e-mail snooping and behavior watching and this Real ID thing only takes it a little more public, national, makes it part of the cultural lexicon because we have finally weakened so much we just don't seem to give a damn what they do to us anymore. Don't think it's all that bad? Think BushCo's flying monkeys in the CIA and FBI and Homeland Security really have your best interests at heart and are genuinely trying to protect you from scary swarthy furriners who want to sneak into our country and poison our Cheerios and paint our flag orange and cover our wimmin in burlap? Have at it. The GOP would love to have you. Oh, and while you're at it, enjoy that tiny grain-of-rice-size bar-coded implant RFID microchip the FDA just approved, which they can permanently slip under your skin in about 20 seconds, with nary a peep. This is what's happening now. With Real ID (and who knows what else), the government is cracking down and creating a new and improved and far more devious and exploitable system to monitor its citizens because, well, because we let them. Because millions of us have been pummeled so successfully by the fear-mongering Right. Because we have never been so lax, so blinded by warmongering and dread, so numbed to what might become of us. Ah, but maybe I'm wrong. Maybe this is just rampant paranoia talking and it's just a silly piece of harmless legislation and Real ID is overall a genuinely good and useful idea that will ultimately make us safer and more secure. You think? Because hasn't BushCo proven to be reliable and honest and just reeking with integrity about privacy and security issues so far? Hasn't the USA Patriot Act been just a wondrous boon to police and CIA and our sense that we are trusted and cared for by our government? Aren't we all feeling just so much safer with this most secretive, least accountable administration at the helm? After all, why not trust the government on this? Why not put our faith in the goodly Homeland Security Department? Maybe Real ID really is patriotic and constructive and it will be a smooth and secure and completely inviolable system, one that protects citizens while giving them a new sense of freedom to move about the country with carefree flag-waving ease, safe in the knowledge that their big, snarling gummint is watching over them like a protective mother bear -- as opposed to, say, a female praying mantis, who greedily screws her lover, and then, of course, eats him alive. ++ OK, so Mark Morford is a smart-ass and freaking badly, as it were, and I probably would have been entertained by his clever writing if I hadn't been freaking too, mouth-breathing and wide-eyed, as I read his article. Perhaps this doesn't bother you, maybe this doesn't set off the siren on your internal Liberty Alarm as it does mine -- I dunno -- maybe it's just me. I just thought you should know, since nobody's made a general announcement that our lives have been complicated, our privacy is to be invaded, our civil liberties surely compromised and our once open society trussed up like a pig on a spit. One more thing our states will have to cut child welfare in order to fund -- one more thing our police will have to manage ['cuz there are gonna be a LOT more unlicensed drivers] -- and one more bite out of the freedom that has made our country great. It's a bit late to raise hell over this -- but at minimum we should take our congresspersons to task for letting this happen without a whimper. They were probably gonna tell us about it when we woke up. Peace ~ Jude No Real Debate for Real ID http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,67471,00.html New York Times | An Unrealistic 'Real ID' www.truthout.org/docs_2005/printer_050405M.shtml Eric Francis is on holiday. Jude, the editor of Political Waves, is standing in for his daily blog this week. You can subscribe to Political Waves (our all-politics news distribution list) for free at the link below. You'll receive between five and 10 news articles each day. You may write to Jude with your responses to her commentaries at moderator@planetwaves.net. Political Waves list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political_waves/ Planet Waves | May 17, 2005 [For those of you who think I'm entirely too spiritual and "Pollyanna-ish" to breathe fire -- a rant...] The last four-plus years have been hard on the American public -- they've been hard on our self-image. We used to have a notion about America as the "land of the free and the home of the brave." Well, we're brave, alright, some of us ... especially those kids we send into the desert without adequate equipment -- but we're not as free as we were ... not nearly. As a young country, both in years and wisdom, we've used our bravery much like an adolescent would ... lots of courage, lots of bluster, not much understanding of consequences. "The Ugly American" stereotype of culturally-challenged hick from decades back has been replaced by "The Bullying American." Not progress, friends ... not good. When terrorism arrived on our shores, we couldn't ignore it anymore [despite our perpetual blind eye to it's effects in most every other nation of the world.] We quickly decided to strike back, return hurt for hurt, while asking the question, "Why do they hate us?" Let's get real, by the way -- that's a little kids question. We went with the standard "Mommy Answer." "They hate us because they're jealous ... we're free and they aren't. Yeah ... that's it." We were content to respond to a complex political inquiry with a simplistic little kid answer that made no sense. It was a sign of the times to come. "They" were making a political statement, we were taking it personally. "They" didn't hate us, they hated the American policies that have systematically made us fatter, richer and more powerful than any other nation, most often by plunder and support of tyrannous governments that gave us favors. But like kids everywhere, taking responsibility for our errors asked for a maturity we hadn't yet assumed. "Allright," we said, strapping on our six-guns -- "Now we'll BLAST those ideas right out of their heads!" [Well, gosh -- it always worked in the cartoons!!] Yes, we've had to rethink who we are in the last four years based on the reflection the world has given us -- not as brave, ultimately, as we thought we were; certainly not brave enough to want to know the truth about ourselves or we'd be insisting on answers to the questions so many are posing. We apparently want safety more than we want freedom, although we have no idea how to achieve it so we'll just continue to either ignore, threaten or kill everyone and everything that doesn't agree with us. And rather than do any real introspection, we're keeping ourselves busy attempting to turn the clock backwards on questions of personal morality without noting that real morality includes the larger questions of war, killing of innocents, poverty, profit and greed. It's been disheartening to think of my nation as stuck in an adolescent loop ... it took me awhile to accept that we were actually as we appeared -- but Bush's re-election nailed it for me. Not that it wasn't close -- or that the numbers weren't messed with because they surely were -- but that at least half of this nation was too afraid to examine its own soul to make the changes that maturity called for. And today I read ... oh, woe ... that we're "apathetic." Yes, fiesty, cheerful, "can-do," tail-wagging-behind-it America is apathetic. It turns out that we have, after two years of dedicated demand, a "smoking gun" on this administrations rush to war with Iraq. The Brits have outed a memo that proves Once And For All that Bush and Blair "fixed" intelligence to fit their intention to invade Iraq. The Brits are holding Blair's feet to the fire on this, as we speak -- and we're looking the other way. Consider this snip from a TruthOut article [link below:] Critics of the Bush administration have long argued that Bush appeared intent on invading Iraq long before Congress voted to authorize military action in October 2002 if Hussein didn't abandon his alleged illegal weapons programs. Former Sen. Bob Graham of Florida, who was chairman of the Senate Select Intelligence Committee when Democrats ruled, has written in his book, "Intelligence Matters," about his visit to MacDill Air Force Base, home of the U.S. Central Command, on Feb. 19, 2002. He was going for a status report on Afghanistan, Graham wrote, but CENTCOM'S Gen. Tommy Franks called him aside to tell him, "Senator, we are not engaged in a war in Afghanistan." "Excuse me?"' Graham replied. "Military and intelligence personnel are being redeployed to prepare for an action in Iraq," Graham quoted Franks as saying. Graham wrote: "I was stunned. This was the first time I had been informed that the decision to go to war with Iraq had not only been made but was being implemented, to the substantial disadvantage of the war in Afghanistan." OK -- so lets be really REALLY clear on this. They lied to us. And they didn't just lie when it was expedient, they intended to lie to us. All the smoke-screen and rationalization we've been offered in the last two years was an all-too-adolescent refusal to take responsibility for their actions, a child-like ploy to "not be found out." Too many of us WANTED to believe them, or more of us would have seen it for what it was. We're apathetic today because we STILL don't want to believe they lied ... if they lied about that, what else have they lied about? If the whole system is faulty, who will save us now? Don't rock the boat, what would happen then? Lets just ignore it and it'll go away. That's our response to proof that the war was a fraud perpetrated on the American public? Have we become so overwhelmed and lethargic and distracted by the details and the denials that we will ignore the bottom line? NONE OF THIS HAD TO HAPPEN! Of all the possible responses to 9/11, a destabilizing war in Iraq was the darkest and most disasterous option -- and we weren't pushed into it by the facts on the ground, the facts were cherry-picked and polished and pushed on us by an administration that engaged our fears and patriotism for it's own purpose. So here's your question for the day. Is it true? Are we just so damned apathetic that we will yawn and nod? Will we just shrug and say, "Well, too late now." I know growing up ain't easy -- it's a long arduous experiment in discerning good sense from bad, and taking responsibility for our choices. This nation appears to be in the middle of that experiment. But the next step ... after the flush of overactive hormones and the obnoxious arrogance of early adolescence ... is rebellion against authority. If half of this nation can't shake off its emotional limitions, at least we can move it along to the next step. A lie of this magnitude is worthy of rebellion. George Bush needs to be held responsible for his actions; he needs to "get some on him," this time. More than any other president in history [read his bio, maybe any human!] he's managed to shift blame for his every mis-step. If there was ever a sign of immaturity, that's it. Enough is enough! We need to go "parental" on him and demand the keys to the family car back before his illigitimate joy ride kills anyone else -- prove to the world that American's are attempting to control their impulsive and immature. Think about Clintons lie ... the GOP rose up on it's hind legs and impeached. Think about Bush's lie, worse by any stretch of the imagination. We have been intentionally decieved and our lives forever changed by the national and political rubble left in the wake of Bush's war ... yes, HIS war. We know now that's exactly what it is. And you and I also know that it must be us, the American public, who holds Bush accountable -- if we don't do it, it won't be done. The adults need to step up. We finally have what we need to turn the conversation ... it seems like we've waited an eternity to get it. If we sleep through this opportunity, then we really WILL deserve what we've got and have no one to blame but ourselves. Write, fax, email, blog, scream, howl -- for the 1,622 American soldiers killed in Iraq and the 12,348 wounded ... for the uncounted dead Iraqi's and their children ... for a newly unstable world, and the wounded reputation of our nation ... for the billions in national treasure spent and misdirected ... and for the string of lies that this president continues to tell, with a wink and a grin. Peace ~ Jude British Memo Reopens War Claim http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/051705Y.shtml Smoking-Gun Context http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=15&ItemID=7867 Eric Francis is on holiday. Jude, the editor of Political Waves, is standing in for his daily blog this week. You can subscribe to Political Waves (our all-politics news distribution list) for free at the link below. You'll receive between five and 10 news articles each day. You may write to Jude with your responses to her commentaries at moderator@planetwaves.net. Political Waves list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political_waves/ Planet Waves | May 16, 2005 First, good news -- Eric arrived safely in New York yesterday. Read his note about scheduling on the post below this one. Then on to the topic of the day -- Star Wars. I remember when I saw the first episode in a tiny, crowded theatre in Davis, California -- that was 1977, and a dear friend and I sat enthralled. At the end she turned to me and said, "That was pure Sagittarius!" Since I am one, and she has Venus in Sag, we were on a contact high for several days [years, maybe.] The Big Theme -- good v. evil -- has not lost its magic in the succeeding generations. My Sagittarian grandson and I finished a phone conversation recently -- "I love you, Wyatt," I said. "I love you too, Grammie," he said with all the sincerity a five-year-old can muster. "May the Force be with you." The Big Theme. We're chewing that over today, aren't we? What is "good" -- what is "evil" -- which "side" will we choose? Not much nuance in that. It's a black or white question. Or is it? Lucas has produced a dark and violent ending for his third prequel episode, Star Wars: Episode III -- The Revenge of the Sith. This is the first Star Wars movie with a PG13 advisory. Seems to me he had no choice, he had to set the stage for the original -- how did Luke and Leia become separated, why were the Jedi decimated, why did Anakin go to the dark side and become Darth, why are so many planets in the twisted grip of the Empire? The straightforward Sagittarian energy of the original Star Wars MUST take a backseat to the complex back-story. The Big Theme is reflected in the Lucas offerings -- as it's reflected in our world today. According to the reviews, Lucas handles the evil prototype ... Darth ... with compassion. We see why he went dark, we understand his choice [while hopefully remembering his redemption in The Return of the Jedi.] A big dose of nuance there, you will note. Lucas asks us for maturity as he moves us toward the context for the original premiss -- in a galaxy, far far away, there is a political situation that calls for a powerful renewal of spiritual dynamic. Remind you of anywhere else? From A. O. Scotts opinion piece [link below]: At one point, Darth Vader, already deep in the thrall of the dark side and echoing the words of George W. Bush, hisses at Obi-Wan, "If you're not with me, you're my enemy." Obi-Wan's response is likely to surface as a bumper sticker during the next election campaign: "Only a Sith thinks in absolutes." This final episode of Star Wars is being well received by critics, although its tone is sorrowful and disturbing -- best to remember that it's only 3 of 6. The whole notion of prequel only works if we remember what happens "next" [or ... in 1977.] The circumstance for a renewal of the Force had come together ... the vacuum of hopelessness demanded that it's opposite appear. Joseph Campbell tells us that "The dark night of the soul comes just before revelation." Along with the high adventure and diversion of the Star Wars tales, we've been given a good deal of wisdom. It's our job to pick through all the blood and angst to find it ... to discern correctly, as Obi-Wan and Yoda advise. Is it soap opera? Sure ... life is soap opera. And we make choices every day about what it means. Kahlil Gibran sums it up this way: Keep me away from the wisdom which does not cry, the philosophy which does not laugh and the greatness which does not bow before children. "What month is it, Grammie?" Wyatt asked a few weeks back. "It's April, honey," I said. His eyes lit up. "It's almost May 19th!" While his parents may not allow him to see this newest installment [akin to trying to stand in front of a moving train] the kid is infected with the mythology of heroism. Our world is full of young Jedi who will write the next chapters of this allegorical tale. We are responsible for their spiritual growth and the messages they hear. We're obligated to teach them compassion and nuance while we are buoyed by their courage and optimism. Real hero's aren't simply point 'n shoot patriots -- they are those who are dedicated to the concept of doing no harm. We need to teach them that the most powerful Force within them is Love. "Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering." ~ Master Yoda Peace ~ Jude Some Surprises in That Galaxy Far, Far Away http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/16/movies/16star.html? Why the Force is still with him http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0513/p12s02-almo.html Eric Francis is on holiday. Jude, the editor of Political Waves, is standing in for his daily blog this week. You can subscribe to Political Waves (our all-politics news distribution list) for free at the link below. You'll receive between five and 10 news articles each day. You may write to Jude with your responses to her commentaries at moderator@planetwaves.net. Political Waves list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political_waves/ Note from
Eric: If you live in the Hudson Valley, Eric is taking appointments for
astrology consultations for mid-week next week, most likely in Woodstock
Wednesday and Thursday, with sessions during the day and late afternoon. Call
Chelsea at (877) 453-8265 for more definite info, or if you are an existing or
former client, or Chronogram reader, you can try your luck reaching Eric
directly on his cell at (206) 852-3184. But also leave a message with Chelsea
please. Thank you! Planet
Waves | May 15, 2005
Ahhhh -- politics. What a snarl, today. You've no doubt heard
the flap about John Bolton's nomination -- and this business of
the "nuclear option" proposed to remove the filibuster [also known as
cloture.] Just more Washington hijinks? No, we're at a serious
juncture -- this is a critical moment in the future of our democratic
process. There are wheels within wheels within webs, on this one.
Lets go over the particulars of two seemingly separate issues.
John Bolton has been proposed to one of the most important positions in our nation -- he will represent the American face at the table of nations. But Bolton does not present an attractive face -- Ted Kennedy said today that Bolton has been the architect of our current political situation in North Korea, and for that alone he should be disqualified. There is evidence that he is one of those politicans that bullied and manipulated to get faulty WMD information. He has insulted just about everyone he's worked with ... including the United Nations, itself. Bob Schieffer said today that he understood that Boltons nomination was the equivelant of throwing him a bone -- he had wanted to be Condi Rice's undersecretary and she wouldn't have him. Meanwhile, the White House, it is reported, did not expect this outcry. Bolton has been a loyal, if abrasive and belligerent "enforcer" for this administration -- and his nomination sends a deliberate message about how little respect America holds for the United Nations. John Bolton's name was advanced by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee without endorsment, which is a rarity. Even if he is confirmed, the message has been sent, world-wide, that John Bolton does not have the confidence of the Congress or the American people ... and this will surely effect his ability to represent us. Now we come to the filibuster, a system whereby minority parties are able to run the clock and delay or block legislation, although this abuse is rare -- it is designed to debate and slow the process and provide the minority a voice. The Republicans have threatened removal of this congressional tool in advance of their push to get controversial judges in place. While only a handful of Bush's nominee's have been blocked, he will not budge on them ... he continues to send the same players that were rejected back to the table. George doesn't "back up," you'll remember -- it's not his style. Bush is making a point with his insistance. These aren't the judges he wants most, anyhow -- we have Supreme's coming up ... and that's the Big Fish our president is eyeing. The judges at question today are just minnows, but the GOP is stirring the waters. Helping them, the Far Right conservative religions are roundly ignoring "separation of church and state" to throw their congregants behind the "nuclear option." The removal of the filibuster, meanwhile, would constitute an unprecidented change to the rules of Congress and harm to the democratic system. Rent Mr. Smith Goes To Washington to see how this works [and who we used to be] -- you will discover that cronyism and manipulation has ever been with us, that nobody on earth could be as naive as Jimmy Stewart's character ... but you will also get a FEELING for this amazing system we embrace, and the pulse of free-speech that beats under its skin. I know people who sneer at the mention of this movie -- they shouldn't. It goes to the heart of who the American people are -- and I hope, continue to be. Most democrats and many moderate Republicans are uphappy to be in this position. To remove filibuster for ANY reason is to limit Congress and discard a "checks and balances" rule instituted by the founding fathers 217 years ago. While Bush has not spoken candidly about what he wants, Washington insiders tell us that arms are being twisted, and intimidation rules the day. George Bush has spent too much of his "political capital" on his losing propositions -- Iraq and Social Security ... he's beginning to quack like a lame duck and he knows it. If Bolton is rejected, Bush will lose considerable face and momentum. If cloture remains in effect to break his judicial deals, he loses even more. In a nutshell, then, we're looking at a power grab. The gears are turning and this has become a bitter struggle to impose majority party will on the legislative body of the Congress of the United States and subdue the minority. The Congress will then act at the pleasure of the president, rather than as a separate body representing the people. The effects of this will define the tone for the rest of this presidents term, and the direction of our nation for years to come. Remember -- you have a voice; if this deadlock in Washington disturbs you, use it. Your congresspersons may or may not feel comfortable with their pending vote on cloture. Most of them are also very aware that their own job is up for grabs in 2006, and their re-election is in the hands of their constituents. Peace ~ Jude The Ultimate Republican Power Grab http://www.interventionmag.com Nuking Democracy http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0515-25.htm What the Founders warned against http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2005/05/12/filibuster_principles/index_np.html Plenty of Harm, Lots of Fouls
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/051405C.shtml Vote 'Wrong,' Go to Hell? http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0513-21.htm Eric
Francis is on holiday. Jude, the editor of Political Waves, is
standing in for his daily blog this week. You can subscribe to Political
Waves (our all-politics news distribution list) for free at the link
below. You’ll receive between five and 10 news articles each day. You may write
to Jude with your responses to her commentaries at
moderator@planetwaves.net.
Political Waves list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political_waves/ Planet
Waves | May 14, 2005
I hug trees -- yes, I'm one of "those." More, I
speak to them ... they are the breathing apparatus for our planet, a vital part
of our ecosystem, and silent sentinels to the folly of mankind. All
around us, life cooperates with itself. My fellows seldom
acknowledge the trees, parks, forrests -- they "maintain" them. I
see this differently. I never NEVER trim a tree [or bush or shrub or any growing
thing] without asking its permission. It's a matter of respect to solicit
cooperation -- I suspect that means I'm a 'greeny.'
If you're a 'greeny,' then you understand that the whole of the environment is connected ... when a butterfly breaks wind in China, a huge pine will eventually sway in a Montana windstorm [to play fast and loose with the concept.] If you're a 'greeny,' then you know that we have only THIS world -- and one shot at protecting it. Air and water are not "optional" to life. When a species dies from loss of habitat, it is gone forever. [Connect the dots ... that could end up being us.] And, happily, if you're a 'greeny,' you can count yourself in the majority of Americans who make choices daily to recycle, conserve and defend our environment. The current administration is not 'green' -- and it's pretending that nobody else is. America has not been notoriously respectful of the ecology, indeed, its stewardship has been dismal. We've turned a blind eye until recent years ... and then, when it looked like we were making progress-- BANG! The door closed tight and our environmental laws began to roll back. In our current "ownership society" the goal is not to preserve shared resources, but to secure individual property. This need not be mutually exclusive, but it has become so -- and it has never counted so much before ... sometimes the sheer logic of a problem demands that we change course. For what we have so seriously 'broken' in the last 150 years, the price has come due. In January of 1855, Chief Seattle ceded his lands in Washington State to the United States government by the Treaty of Point Elliott; in a letter to U.S. President Franklin Pierce in 1854, he wrote: " ... this land is sacred to us.
This shining water that moves
in the streams and rivers is not just water but the blood of our
ancestors.
If we sell you land, you must remember that it is sacred, and you must teach your children that it is sacred and that each ghostly reflection in the clear water of the lakes tells of events and memories in the life of my people. The water's murmur is the voice of my father's father. The rivers are our brothers, they quench our thirst. The rivers carry canoes, and feed our children. If we sell you our land, you must remember, and teach your children, that the rivers are our brothers, and yours, and you must henceforth give the rivers the kindness you would give any brother. We know that the white man does not understand our ways. One portion of land is the same to him as the next, for he is a stranger who comes in the night and takes from the land whatever he needs. The earth is not his brother, but his enemy, and when he has conquered it, he moves on..... His appetite will devour the earth and leave behind only a desert. I do not know. Our ways are different from your ways... This we know: the earth does not belong to man; man belongs to the earth. This we know." ~ Chief Seattle (c.1784-1866) Part of this recent resistance to protecting the wellbeing of our planet comes from a religious community that evidently doesn't think it needs to last much longer -- but I was heartened to see a number of recent articles that indicate that many mainstream, moderate churches are supportive of environmentalism -- even some of the very conservative. We need more people of vision to stand up. This is a HUMAN dilemma, not a religious one. George Bush is not listening to the majority of Americans on this subject
but science is proving that we have serious problems. Those problems must be
acknowledged before they can be dealt with.
In science it often happens that scientists say, "You know that's a really good argument; my position is mistaken," and then they would actually change their minds and you never hear that old view from them again. They really do it. It doesn't happen as often as it should, because scientists are human and change is sometimes painful. But it happens every day. I cannot recall the last time something like that happened in politics or religion. ~ Carl Sagan, astronomer and writer (1934-1996) If you Google "environmental activism" you will find over 2 million entries -- somewhere in there you will find hints on how to be a better steward of the environment, and a number of activist opportunities. For your children, and their children -- and our intimate dependency upon one another and Gaia -- pick one or two; contribute; support; fax, email, write. We need to shout loud enough to make this government hear our united voice. Peace ~ Jude Mystery of the Vanishing Salmon http://www.truthout.org/issues_05/050405EA.shtml Swiss Put Glacier Under Wraps to Slow Ice Melt http://www.truthout.org/issues_05/051205EC.shtml Pentagon Is Asking Congress to Loosen Environmental Laws http://www.truthout.org/issues_05/051105EB.shtml Cornerstone environmental law, NEPA, under fire in energy bill http://www.truthout.org/issues_05/050905EA.shtml Eric Francis is on holiday. Jude, the editor of Political Waves, is standing in for his daily blog this week. You can subscribe to Political Waves (our all-politics news distribution list) for free at the link below. You’ll receive between five and 10 news articles each day. You may write to Jude with your responses to her commentaries at moderator@planetwaves.net. Political Waves list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political_waves/ Planet Waves | May
13, 2005
I was born a few months after the United States dropped
their payload on Japan. I guess that makes me one of the earliest
"boomers." I'm also one of the very first tv addicts, unable to remember
life without it. I do have very early memories of the entire neighborhood
gathered around our family tv set [little bitty screen, grainy black 'n white
image, popcorn being passed.] We were one of those fortunate few who could
afford such a luxury. I remember the first color tv's -- that big [proud]
peacock dazzling us with its extra-bright tail at every commercial break. I
remember when rabbit-ears went in the trash and antennas came off the roof in
favor of cable -- and tv became a 24 hour proposition. Then came
"premium channels." And pay-per-view.
While the tv junky in me is pleased as punch to have all those options -- sadly, I don't consider this progress. First of all, the quality of programming is dismal and redundant ... back-to-back re-runs even on those networks that produce their own programming ... news stories loop over and over again, most of them patronizing sound-bites -- if I wanted war coverage accompanied by patriotic music and flapping American flags, I'd rent Patton. And because I get around the web [I didn't hear this on tv] cable news does not include what the government refers to as "hostile information." That would be ... ummm ... stuff that makes them look bad. Since most everything does -- what kind of "news" is that? Who's responsible? We are, of course. They "give us what we want," according to tv exec's ... everything's judged by ratings, and if ratings drop -- yer outta here! It follows then that tv reflects the sensibilities of the general public. But that shouldn't shock anyone -- while there are exceptions to the rule, tv is not an educational tool; it was designed to keep us busy and entertained, and sell us things we didn't even know we wanted, not teach us critical thinking. "The problem is not that television presents us with entertaining subject matter, but that all subject matter is presented as entertaining." ~ Neil Postman As much as I love tv [and set my VCR to grab those few programs that hold my interest these days] I fear that what it used to be was vastly better than what it has become. It used to be BENIGN entertainment ... it's not, anymore -- it dumbs us down while it pretends to inform us, and I find myself in agreement with this Raymond Chandler quote: So by all means let's have a television show quick and long, even if the commercial has to be delivered by a man in a white coat with a stethoscope hanging around his neck, selling ergot pills. After all the public is entitled to what it wants, isn't it? The Romans knew that and even they lasted four hundred years after they started to putrefy. And tv news? Reminds me of infomercials ... it "sells" me notions the same way QVC wants to sell me cutlery at 2 am. There are a handful of channels that are better than others -- PBS used to be one of them, but don't hold your breath now. C-SPAN, BBC. Still, we need to practice discernment with anything we're being told -- don't drink the Kool-Aid, dearhearts. They don't call it the "boob tube" for nothing. William Rivers Pitt has a few things to say on this subject -- here's a snip: For me, that's it in a nutshell. That's what ails us as a nation. The corporate media does not report the news anymore. They create consensus, they manufacture the common fictions under which we are expected to live. With the TV media, this behavior is all the more insidious because TV reaches everyone. Television is the most extraordinarily effective tool of mass control that has ever been invented by anyone anywhere. Read his article below, and another from the American Progress Action Fund -- READING is still a worthwhile and valuable skill, no matter WHAT they tell you on tv. Peace ~
Jude See No
Evil, Hear No Evil, Speak No Evil http://www.americanprogressaction.org/site/pp.asp?c=klLWJcP7H&b=100480&lftnav=progressreport Eric Francis is on holiday. Jude, the editor of Political
Waves, is standing in for his daily blog this week. You can subscribe
to Political Waves (our all-politics news distribution list)
for free at the link below. You’ll receive between five and 10 news articles
each day. You may write to Jude with your responses to her commentaries at
moderator@planetwaves.net.
Political Waves list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political_waves/ Note to Readers in the Hudson Valley We are currently sniffing out a place for me to do astrology consultations in the Hudson Valley. It's a little late to be doing this, I know, but much else has been going on and it kind of snuck up. Ideally, this would be a location in New Paltz, Kingston or Woodstock. The door needs to close; it's better if there are not cats, but it's probably okay as I'm less allergic these days. As a gift for providing a space to work, I'll offer a session to the person whose space it is -- if they are interested. This will be for one or two days the week of May 9-14. If you know of something or have something, please call Chelsea at (877) 453-8265 or (206) 567-4455, Eastern time. Thank you so much. e Planet Waves | May 12,
2005
"Politics is the process and method of decision-making for groups of human beings. Although it is generally applied to governments, politics is also observed in all human group interactions including corporate, academic, and religious." [Wikipedia] The thing about politics -- the reason it feels so overwhelming -- is that you have to connect the dots from one bit of information to another in order to form a Big Picture of what's actually happening on the ground. That's not always easy, it's always time-consuming and the results are usually disheartening. We used to have trusted people to do that for us but not so much these days. I suppose you've heard all the yelping about mainstream media not doing it's job -- not asking the hard questions that we've depended on from reporters in generations gone by. "Who, What, Where, When" lays out the bare bones of the news -- but repeating statements that people make without a critical eye to the truth of the matter "does not a reporter make." Investigative reporting is becoming a lost art ... the "cost" of crossing the Powers That Be appears too high, lest one become "Rathered" [...and there goes the portfolio, doncha know.] So today, lets just review the actual statements of the least candid and most carefully scripted president in memory -- perhaps we will find some hint there of "truth in government." Thanks to the American Progress Action Fund, who publishes one of the bits you will find below on a daily basis -- this is a sampling over the last six months: I live in a transparent country. I live in a country where decisions made by government are wide open and people are able to call people to – me to account, which many out here do on a regular basis." ~ President George W. Bush, 2/24/05 VERSUS "Secrecy in [the United States] government appears to be on the increase." ~ Judge Robert W. Sweet of the Southern District of New York, 2/24/05 "And the great and proud nation of Egypt, which showed the way toward peace in the Middle East, can now show the way toward democracy in the Middle East." ~ President Bush, 2/21/05 VERSUS Egypt's new election regulations are "seen by the opposition as putting a gag on serious contenders, as all the elected bodies are dominated by Mubarak's ruling party and its supporters. 'These regulations are utterly disappointing, totally undemocratic,' said Hamdeen Sabahi, an independent lawmaker in the lower house." ~ Los Angeles Times, 5/9/05 Thank you all for coming today to hear this conversation about how to make sure [Social Security] functions well for a young generation of Latinos and people from all walks of life. ~ President Bush, 5/4/04 VERSUS "Under the 'progressive indexing' benefit structure backed by Bush, an average wage-earner retiring in 2045 would have benefits cut by 16%, analysts estimate." ~ L.A. Times, 5/5/05 I do not believe … the government should impose on power plants mandatory emissions reductions for carbon dioxide.… This is especially true given the incomplete state of scientific knowledge of the causes of, and solutions to, global climate change." ~ President George Bush VERSUS "There is a better scientific consensus on this than on any other issue I know – except maybe Newton's second law of dynamics." ~ Scientist D. James Baker, former administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration "Unfortunately, we are seeing a disturbing pattern, where too often judicial confirmations are being turned into ideological battles.... They seek to undermine the nominations of candidates who agree with my philosophy that judges should interpret the law, not try to make law from the bench." ~ President Bush, 3/13/02 VERSUS "Once competency is established, the most important qualification for a judge is commitment to following the law as it is written - regardless of personal philosophy. Justice Priscilla Owen is clearly competent, but her record demonstrates a results-oriented streak that belies supporters' claims that she strictly follows the law." ~ San Antonio Express News, 7/21/02 "Too much politics in Washington, D.C. There's too many people saying, well we can't work with this group because it might help them get an upper hand, or can't work with that crowd because they might get an upper hand.… We've got to rise above the olitics…." ~ President Bush, 4/26/05 VERSUS "Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice told her senior staff she was disappointed about the stream of allegations and said she did not want any information coming out of the department that could adversely affect the [John Bolton] nomination." ~ Washington Post, 4/20/05 "The American people did not place us in office to pass on problems to future generations and future Presidents and future Congresses." ~ President Bush, 3/12/05 VERSUS "[A]doption of the policies proposed by the [President's 2006 budget] would increase the deficit by $104 billion over the next five years (2006 through 2010) and $1.6 trillion over the next 10 years (2006 through 2015), compared with the deficits that would occur if there are no changes in current policies." ~ CBPP, 3/8/05 "This notion that the United States is getting ready to attack Iran is simply ridiculous. Having said that, all options are on the table." ~ George W. Bush, 2/22/05 VERSUS "Again, all options are on the table, and – but one thing I will not allow is a nation such as Iraq to threaten our very future by developing weapons of mass destruction." ~ George W. Bush, 3/13/02 "We're working closely with Britain, France and Germany as they oppose Iran's nuclear ambitions...The results of this approach now depend largely on Iran." ~ President Bush, 2/21/05 VERSUS "A senior administration official said the United States had no intention of directly joining ongoing talks aimed at restraining Iran's alleged nuclear weapons program, although many European officials have expressed concern that the talks involving Britain, France, Germany and Iran will fail without U.S. involvement." ~ Washington Post, 2/21/05 "Now we need to focus on giving young people, especially young men in our cities, better options than apathy, or gangs, or jail. Tonight I propose a three-year initiative to help organizations keep young people out of gangs." ~ President Bush, 2/2/05 VERSUS The White House has "proposed a 40 percent cut in federal juvenile justice and delinquency prevention funding, which supports anti-gang programs in communities across the country. That's on top of a 44 percent overall reduction in delinquency-fighting and anti-gang funds since 2002." ~ Fight Crime: Invest in Kids, 6/1/04 "If we failed to act in Iraq, the dictator's weapons of mass destruction programs would continue to this day." ~ President Bush, 2004 State of the Union VERSUS A revised CIA report titled "Iraq: No Large-Scale Chemical Warfare Efforts Since Early 1990s," will state that "former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein gave up his chemical weapons program after the 1991 Gulf War." ~ AP, 2/1/05 "Members of Congress could take some lessons from Chile, particularly when it comes to how to run our pension plans." ~ President Bush, 4/16/01 VERSUS "Chile's Retirees Find Shortfall in Private Plan" ~ NY Times headline, 1/27/05 "I agreed to allow federal funding to go forward on existing stem cell lines … Out of those 70 lines, some 22 are functional now. And out of that 22 lines, there's over 300 different projects that are going forward." ~ President Bush, 9/20/04 VERSUS "All human embryonic stem cell lines approved for use in federally funded research are contaminated with a foreign molecule from mice that may make them risky for use in medical therapies, according to a study released Sunday." ~ LA Times 1/24/05 "There should be no excuse saying, well, it's an unfunded mandate. Forget it – it will be funded." ~ President Bush on No Child Left Behind, 1/12/05 VERSUS "The bipartisan National Governors Association voted unanimously in 2003 to name No Child Left Behind an 'unfunded mandate,' which means the federal government isn't supplying the money needed to make the law work." ~ Bloomberg, 1/12/04 We're all "political" according to the Wikipedia definition -- we're all in a constant act of decision making. Those decisions cannot depend on taking anything at face value, today -- what we believe can no longer depend on what we're being told. Or, to put it another way ... "...fool me once, shame on ... shame on you. Fool me ... you can't get fooled again." ~ George
W. Bush, September 2002
We will have to connect the dots ourselves. Peace ~ Jude Eric Francis is on holiday. Jude, the editor of
Political Waves, is standing in for his daily blog this week.
You can subscribe to Political Waves (our all-politics news
distribution list) for free at the link below. You’ll receive between five and
10 news articles each day. You may write to Jude with your responses to her
commentaries at
moderator@planetwaves.net. Political Waves list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political_waves/ Planet Waves | May 11,
2005
My mother was a fanatic about lying. "Are you telling me the truth?" she'd ask, head cocked, giving me that squinty-eyed Mother assessment [you know, the one that puts your heart in your mouth and turns your knees to water?] "I want the truth," she'd demand ... and then the coup de grâce, "...and Don't Leave Anything Out!" Everybody has an agenda, everybody spins their story, everybody has a "face" they wish to present. "Don't Leave Anything Out" pretty much exposes the little details that vaporize any intent to obscure the truth. [Mom was a first class interrogator.] So, talking politics, today lets look at outsourcing -- and in the case of "extraordinary rendition," outsourcing torture. As regards an adequate explanation of this practice, our government has "left a lot out." That's because, they argue, it's a "secret." It is, at minimum, a secret agreement and a secret from us. They don't want the publics opinion because it would require us all to face one of the great moral dilemmas of our times; can we justify the systematic torture of others to keep this nation "safe?" Under what circumstances do we torture? How much torture is "too much?" Are these our new "American values?" And what happened to the Geneva Convention in our brave new world -- the "agreement of civilized nations?" I'm not going to get into Abu Ghraib or Gitmo -- history will show our thumbprint there, more's the pity. I'm talking about the kidnapping of "people of interest" to the CIA that are whisked away to cooperating nations that will torture them FOR us. Enough of those people have survived their experience and returned, with no charges filed, to blow the whistle. Nobody's telling the whole of it -- "plausable deniability" in our government today means it hasn't officially "happened" until you admit it. Consider this quote from a March New York Times article: In the most explicit statement of the administration's policies, Alberto R. Gonzales, then the White House counsel, said in written Congressional testimony in January that "the policy of the United States is not to transfer individuals to countries where we believe they likely will be tortured, whether those individuals are being transferred from inside or outside the United States." Mr. Gonzales said then that he was "not aware of anyone in the executive branch authorizing any transfer of a detainee in violation of that policy." Administration officials have said that approach is consistent with American obligations under the Convention Against Torture, the international agreement that bars signatories from engaging in extreme interrogation techniques. But in interviews, a half-dozen current and former government officials said they believed that, in practice, the administration's approach may have involved turning a blind eye to torture. One former senior government official who was assured that no one was being mistreated said that accumulation of abuse accounts was disturbing. "I really wonder what they were doing, and I am no longer sure what I believe," said the official, who was briefed periodically about the rendition program. The Times article covered a history of rendition, including pre-9/11 restrictions placed on the CIA that "required review and approval by interagency groups led by the White House, and ... usually authorized to bring prisoners to the United States or to other countries to face criminal charges." Now we no longer need the charges or the review. Those are the restrictions that were deemed "quaint" and discarded by Alberto Gonzales. Still, how can George Bush say, with a straight face, "Torture is never acceptable, nor do we hand over people to countries that do torture." Well, maybe the CIA is doing it behind his back? But -- hey -- if the President of the United States doesn't know if torture is being done in the name of the American people, who does? Evidently our good friend Egypt does: The New York Times reports on evidence that the United States has regularly sent terror suspects to Uzbekistan, an "authoritarian state" known for beating and asphyxiating prisoners, boiling body parts, using electroshock on genitals and "plucking off fingernails and toenails with pliers." U.S. relying on regime notorious for
torture?
Saudi Arabia, Syria and Jordan have also "helped us out." Syria? -- "Axis of Evil" Syria? The very same. In this matter of rendition, I guess we've decided to take their word for it that they won't "hurt anyone." [But not for anything else.] "I'm no longer sure what I believe," said the senior official quoted above. Too much plausable deniability ... too many expose's and whistleblowers ... too many dark reports and evidence. We know there are women and children in Abu Ghraib. We know there are children at Gitmo. But we don't know who's being "dissapeared" in the night to a nation that will torture in our name ... shhhhh! It's a secret. Here's another Mom-ism. "If you lie to me today," she'd
say, "I won't trust you tomorrow. When you've broken trust with
someone, it takes a long long time to
mend."
On this topic of torture,
we've broken trust with the world, who get to see our policies
play out up close and personal -- and the real "secrets" we have
to worry about are those being kept from the American people. Our
reputation as the Land of Liberty will take, as Mom said, a long long time
to mend ... and how long, if ever, will it take to mend the lives
of those who are being tortured right now, this minute, in our
name?
Peace ~
Jude
Rule Change Lets C.I.A. Freely Send Suspects Abroad to Jails http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/06/politics/06intel.html The story of Canadian citizen Maher Arar, who was "rendered" to Syria for torture but never charged, told in Armando's diary, "Torture: One of Bush's Victims" http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/2/25/113914/269 The online interview with Jane Mayer, author of The New Yorker's "OUTSOURCING TORTURE: The secret history of America's
"extraordinary rendition" program"
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?050214fa_fact6 Eric Francis is on holiday. Jude,
the editor of Political Waves, is standing in for his daily
blog this week. You can subscribe to Political Waves (our
all-politics news distribution list) for free at the link below. You’ll receive
between five and 10 news articles each day. You may write to Jude with your
responses to her commentaries at
moderator@planetwaves.net. Political Waves list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political_waves/ Planet Waves | May 10, 2005
Namaste! I love to use that word
when I write -- like Shalom and Aloha, that's a word that you can start with, or
end with, or tuck anywhere in between. When I was first introduced to
yoga, years back, I was told it meant that "The God in me salutes the God in
you." The 21st century version, a'la Deepak Chopra, goes
-- "I honor in you the divine that I honor within myself and I know that we are
one."
It's that "one" part I'd like to talk about
today.
It's our lowest-common denominators that connect us all -- in our many similarities, the family of humankind is one family. No matter what our culture or our religion or our politics, we all want our children warm and fed, given opportunities to thrive. We all want work that gives us purpose, relationships that buoy and sustain us, freedom from poverty and disease and despair. Too many on this planet go without those basic needs met ... too many are unable to ensure their own survival from day to day. To make it worse, their countries are often war-torn and full of corruption -- with such poverty, how could it be otherwise? This is the model: when the population of a country can
support and educate itself, it becomes stable. When a country becomes
stable, it turns its attention toward peaceful means and cooperation. When
a country begins to prosper, it takes its place at the table of nations. At that
table, it participates in peaceful negotiation of its differences. That's
why bombs won't bring us peace ... only domestic peace can insure political
stability.
There are things we can do to help.
When I am able, I like to give goats for birthdays and holidays. I hope one day to afford a water buffalo. If this doesn't stike a nerve with you, you haven't heard about Heifer International. This is an extraordinary charity -- it supplies
destitute people in third world countries with animals and/or agricultural
supplies that allows them to both feed themselves and market their product as
well. This is "teaching a man to fish," in the broadest terms ... although
I find that it is mostly the women who take advantage of this opportunity,
enabling them to feed and educate their children. Part of the
"contract" is that they are to pass on some of their animals or seedlings, as
well as their expertise, to their neighbors. The pleasure of knowing that
your gift set into motion an opportunity for independence and prosperity for an
impoverished community is contageous -- when you mention the birthday
goat, or Christmas seedlings, or Easter rabbits to the friend who
received notice of that contribution in their name, they will reward you with a
big old grin [and as you know, I like smiles!] It's a great
project, Heifer. Check it out.
Which brings me to the Millenium Project. In 2000, all the member countries of the UN adopted the Millennium Development Goals, aimed to eradicate extreme poverty and ensure universal primary education and basic health care by the year 2015. "Extreme poverty" would include those who live on less than a dollar a day, or the equivelant. The goals, surprisingly, are achievable ... all it takes is funding -- and considering how much is routinely being spent elsewhere, not that much. [I read that the Army awarded Halliburton $72 million in bonuses, today -- Jeffrey Sachs says that half a million kids could be protected from deadly malaria if they slept under nets that cost $7 each.] Sachs is the professor, author and economic adviser who directs this global development project and I love to hear him talk about it because it's so do-able ... but each time he appears on PBS or elsewhere, little progress has been made. The United States, for instance, devotes somewhere in the neighborhood of .07 percent of it's national budget to this project -- and much of that is going into AIDS medicines and emergency food relief. Nothing is being applied to "cause" -- the money is going to "effect." Jeff Sachs says that when people hear that scant number, they don't believe it ... they assume that the world's Superpower is giving much more of its budget to sustain other countries, double-digit numbers at least. As well, the US is filtering that money through so many specifics, it has created dissent among the recipients. For instance, to quote International Planned Parenthood Federation spokesperson, Eve Fox ...for the past ten years, Brazil's HIV/AIDS effort has been a model for the international community. Their program emphasizes condom use and distribution and comprehensive sex education and is also quite open about sexuality and prostitution. Last week, Brazil's AIDS Program refused to comply with the new rule that all HIV/AIDS organizations must officially condemn prostitution or lose USAID funding. In doing so, they forfeited $40 million in USAID money because they feared that condemning prostitution would undermine their ability to treat HIV/AIDS and slow the spread of the disease." Along with US censure of abortion and condom use, our money isn't very popular these days -- and the dying continues in alarming numbers. Write your legislators. And have you heard about ONE? If
you think artists and actors and singers shouldn't have a political
voice, then don't go to http://www.one.org/
If you think that's just peachy, then open the link --
watch the cool ad they've produced; it ran recently on a Jon
Stewart "Daily Show" commercial break, and I was
delighted with the many faces I saw in support of this movement. Sign the
ONE petition [with the likes of Tom Hanks, Brad Pitt, Bono and
a half-million others] that declares:
"WE BELIEVE that in the best American tradition of
helping others help themselves, now is the time to join with other countries in
a historic pact for compassion and justice to help the poorest people of the
world overcome AIDS and extreme poverty. WE RECOGNIZE that a pact including such
measures as fair trade, debt relief, fighting corruption and directing
additional resources for basic needs - education, health, clean water, food, and
care for orphans - would transform the futures and hopes of an entire generation
in the poorest countries, at a cost equal to just one percent more of the US
budget. WE COMMIT ourselves - one person, one voice, one vote at a time - to
make a better, safer world for all."
I can't save the world today, neither can you ...
but together we can do a lot to improve it -- every child is just like our
child, their every bright dream for tomorrow mirrors our own childrens dreams.
The family of humankind IS one. Open the links, investigate, act.
Namaste ~
Jude
Read more about the UN goals here: UN Millenium Goals http://www.unmillenniumproject.org/ JEFFREY SACHS The End of Poverty: Interview with Jeffrey Sachs http://www.motherjones.com/news/qa/2005/05/jeffrey_sachs.html Eric Francis is on holiday. Jude, the editor of Political Waves, is standing in for his daily blog this week. You can subscribe to Political Waves (our all-politics news distribution list) for free at the link below. You’ll receive between five and 10 news articles each day. You may write to Jude with your responses to her commentaries at moderator@planetwaves.net. Political Waves list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political_waves/ Planet Waves | May 9, 2005
I read today that John Kerry wants us all to get angry about the current situation in America. Well, gosh, didn't the progressives already do that? Howard Dean did that very successfully and then coverage of his victory howl branded him zealot and left the field open for John, who, I guess, wasn't all that angry last year. To be fair, he was caught in an "attack/defend" loop that cut the knee's out from under him -- but if John had a bunch of good ideas about how to fix the nation, he kept them to himself. Too bad. Good ideas trump rhetoric any day. Granted, anger is a terrific motivator. Anger shot-gunned out without foresight creates chaos -- anger turned within ourselves creates depression -- but anger as a catalyst to focused action is a creative force to be reckoned with. When we use our anger to respond to a stimulus, rather than simply react to one, we are creating a mighty wave of energy that ripples out before us. The worrisome thing about anger, though, is that it ... like fear ... channels through our adrenal glands. Most of us have been angry and/or afraid a long time now, and this nation -- most of the world, I'd think -- is suffering adrenal exhaustion. We're weary ... and we've still got so much to do, so far to go. Interestingly, it's almost like somebody put on a "slow dance," recently ... a little breathing space. Our congress has slowed down, too -- nose to nose and not moving at all. Sometimes slowing down a little is a good thing, a way to notice what's going on in ourselves. One of the things I've noticed in the last several weeks is a kind of "energetic opportunity" -- I call it the "Do Over" energy. I see it happening in the lives of people I know, in the news ... in my life too. We're having opportunity to re-do some situation that didn't turn out as we'd hoped the first time, didn't satisfy us. It may not look just the same as it did in our first encounter, but if we get quiet we can see the similarities. We will find out how much we've learned by how we approach an old pattern -- how to "do it differently" this time. Hopefully, we know ourselves better, now -- maybe we've matured a bit and see where we went wrong the first time -- perhaps now we will respond to our situation, rather than react to it. Look in your life and see if you can find such a situation ... I think you'll find something you're challenged by today has resonance to something that has happened before, some echo from your past. If you find opportunity for a Do Over, realize that you're blessed. There are a LOT of things that could use a Do Over, don't you think? In my perfect world, our anger would be harnessed into thoughtful, productive problem solving. What if we took our anger and allowed it creative expression in new ideas to replace the one's that are running our politicians through hoops today? What if we put our heads together and drew up a dynamite new idea to solve Social Security solvency? What if we developed and introduced a crackerjack energy plan that would wean us off of fossil fuels without assault to our environment? How about a thoughtful plan for securing our borders that neutralizes racism? The politicians would sneer at all this, you say? So what? A good idea has punch that a failed idea can't hope to compete against. A truly worthy idea captures our imagination and inspires our cooperation. A great idea can't be denied. If John Kerry had been brimming with great idea's he'd have been able to leap over the "fear tapes" that played us into another four years of George Bush, and land on his feet, running. A hopeful article I read today [link below] says that the majority of Americans ... Democrat, Republican and Independent ... are tired of the war in Iraq. The Brits have already had their say -- its clear they're tired too. The withdrawal from Vietnam, a knowledgable reporter of the time suggests, came to a close not because of the anti-war demonstrations but because the nation just got tired of war. It takes a lot of juice to do a war -- it takes a lot of juice to protest one -- and Vietnam was a Granddaddy of a war and a protest movement. At some point, when the weariness sets in, it dawns on the collective that it wasn't such a great idea to start with and it gets worse the longer we think about it. We start questioning the drum beat and the nationalism and the things the politicians are telling us. Here's the Good News -- the polls suggest that we're coming to that collective point, today. It's time to take a breath, see where we are, and re-think the situation. If the polls are right, more of our neighbors are with us than we think. We need to turn our energy toward solutions that have some chance of making our world a better place in which to live, come to some determinations about what "safety" and "homeland security" actually look like, brainstorm on how to bring the international community back to the table. We need to be able to say something more than "We told you so!" when this nation backs up far enough to say, "What next?" We need to hold our legislators responsible for offering creative solutions instead of dancing endlessly at cross-point to old dilemmas. As always -- write, fax, e-mail, talk and ponder ... the opportunity is upon us to change the direction of the conversation ... the public is hungry to hear it. So am I. "I'm fed up to the ears with old men dreaming up wars for young men to die in," said George McGovern. I'm with THAT George -- it's time for a world-wide Do Over -- and we need some fresh new collaborative ideas to replace these old ones, to insure that the old men do just that ... dream, in their rockers ... out on the porch at the ranch. Peace ~ Jude Democracy, What Democracy? Troops Out Now. Laura Flanders http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0508-30.htm Eric Francis is on holiday. Jude, the editor of Political Waves, is standing in for his daily blog this week. You can subscribe to Political Waves (our all-politics news distribution list) for free at the link below. You’ll receive between five and 10 news articles each day. You may write to Jude with your responses to her commentaries at moderator@planetwaves.net. Political Waves list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political_waves/ Planet Waves | from Jude on May 8, 2005 In the States, it's Mother's Day. I wish a day of blessing, then, to those of you who are mothers, or those of you who have one. The historical essence of this day is the celebration of goddess ... woman energy. In our current culture, honoring Mom is a handy and somewhat covert way to remain aware of the Divine Feminine without actually saying so and getting everybody riled up. This honoring of the feminine has had many iterations over the centuries, in almost every culture, but I am particularly moved by that of Julia Ward Howe in 1872. The article below speaks to that, and for me, today. Happy Mothers Day ~ Jude Watch out: Becoming a Mother Changes Everything Mary Babic May 7, 2005 by CommonDreams.org http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0507-27.htm Here's what I'd like for Mother's Day: No flowers. No candy. Not even a card, however hip and humorous. Because right now, being a mother feels like the most perilous and primal job I will ever have. And a box of chocolates will do nothing to appease my passion and anger. When my daughters slammed out of my body years ago, it seemed logical and satisfying - the end result of nine months of eating cheese and spinach, buying diaper genies and tiny sweaters. I was ready for all the changes in my life. But I wasn't at all prepared for what was about to happen to me. Nobody warns you about the astounding phenomenon of becoming a mother. Oh, plenty of pundits cover the physical transformations -- the drooping boobs, the spongy abdomen-- and the fiscal implications; and the lifestyle shifts. But nobody, just nobody, lets you in on the dirty secret: mothers are different, and mothering makes you different. Sometimes, mothering is the shiny, soft-focus experience sold in greeting cards and telephone commercials: giggles in bed, cookie dough in the kitchen, hugs in the playground. And sometimes it's the hair-pulling, head-pounding experience you have in the morning: stumbling on Legos in the bedroom, realizing homework isn't done, hustling to find clean underwear and pull the lumps out of bed to get to school on time. And sometimes, just sometimes, it's as primal and bloody as life ever gets. The lioness instinct to draw a big paw around them and pull them close to the chest, to protect them from everything the world offers: cold, hunger, taunting, fast food, dirty magazines, uncomfortable shoes. Every day is a challenge to the tiny, warm world inside our house. And lately, the challenge has grown so much bigger. Because - and it seems hard to remember, most days, when media is dominated by pop stars' pregnancies and "American Idol" results - our country is at war. We are engaged in a deadly war in a country far away. How is this not at the forefront of our minds and hearts every day? How do the mothers bear it? Yes, the world has grown darker and colder since 9/11; and I feel that anxiety for myself and my children. But the choices we have made in the wake of the attacks have only exacerbated what was wrong all along. It seems like the U.S. has taken a big crayon and drawn all over the world: here are the bad guys, we can bomb them; here are the good guys, we'll send them more bombs of their own. Black and white, evil and liberty, wrong and right. Well, I'll tell you what I see: mothers and children. Sometimes, I see American mothers here at home: waiting and praying for their children to come back from wars on foreign soil; watching the news and wondering how much longer their sons can dodge the snipers' bullets. So many years of wiping tears and making macaroni and mending pants - to be canceled by what? A man in his own land, with his own government, who does not want to be occupied any longer. Who sees her son as an enemy. The kid who played with super hero dolls and sang in the choir. And sometimes, I see Iraqi mothers, and their children. They endured Saddam Hussein; they endured a war to oust him; they are now enduring scarce resources and ongoing violence, the daily losses of life and limbs. So what I want for Mother's Day this year: a commitment to peace. A commitment to find a way to get our troops out of Iraq, and to let the Iraqis create their own future. As a mother, I want to protect my children; and the children in other countries. This isn't a new idea. In 1872, horrified by the Franco-Prussian war, reeling from the Civil War, Julia Ward Howe created Mother's Peace Day. She believed we needed a day set aside for people to enact the values of motherhood: values that "make for peace." The idea was to honor what would keep mothers' sons from being brutalized by war. It was to honor peace, and mothers' role in keeping their children safe. She worried not just about death and destruction, maiming and disfigurement. She cared that husbands and sons were made into killers. She saw all the work of mothers undone: "Our sons shall not be taken from us to unlearn all that we have been able to teach them of mercy, charity, and patience." She wondered "Why do not the mothers of mankind interfere in these matters, to prevent the waste of human life of which they alone know and bear the cost?" Her words ring out today. And I'll tell you: mothers are ready to stand up, and to say: leave my children out of it. ++ Mary Babic is the Director of Communications at WAND (Women's Action for New Directions) she can be reached at mbabic@wand.org | www.wand.org Eric Francis is on holiday. Jude, the editor of Political Waves, is standing in for his daily blog this week. You can subscribe to Political Waves (our all-politics news distribution list) for free at the link below. You’ll receive between five and 10 news articles each day. You may write to Jude with your responses to her commentaries at moderator@planetwaves.net. Political Waves list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/political_waves/ Planet Waves | from Eric
on May 8, 2005
Mykonos, May 8, 2005 Sun Taurus, Moon Taurus Dear Friends: On May 5, I visited Delos for the first time -- the island birthplace of the twins Artemis, Goddess of the Moon, and Apollo, God of the Sun, of light and divination. I was led to the Cave of Kynthos, which I later learned was a sanctuary for the worship of Heracles, and subsequently learned was an early place of worship for Apollo. Given that the temple is built as part of a natural feature in the land, it's likely to be one of the older ritual sites on the island. Using the Thoth Tarot by Crowley/Harris, I cast divination for myself, however, a portion of the message came through as collective, that is, to be shared. It was the only portion that I scribed. After preparing the sanctuary and calling in the directions, I cast the cards on what appeared to be an altar, but later learned was once the base of a statue of Heracles previously held in the temple (dated, based on fragments found at the site, to the 3rd century BC). Here is the verbatim transcript of the message, from May 5, 2005 at 12:21 pm EED: "We need to remember that we build our community surrounded by a larger world in which fear seems to dominate. This condition is really a firewalk for the people on the planet, as the challenge is primarily fear itself. "We have protection from that fear as long as we make a conscious choice to stay in the light, and to remember one another. And remember what to do with the awareness of collective fear: be mindful of the fact that it represents an impasse after a long history of pain and struggle, which we can view as the death and dissolution of our shared reality -- or as the opportunity to raise awareness in this moment and recognize that we have nothing to lose by the choice to love, to take one another's hands, and to walk through a seemingly impossible situation. "No matter how closely we align with the state of love within us and around us -- no matter how deeply we touch the impossible -- we are reminded that the body memory of the place we have been is never far from awareness; for the moment, it comes with us as a potential experience or projection in the world around us. Inner fear may become an outer experience, as may love. "It may be that the abundance of love enters our lives -- that toward which all honest seekers direct their true quest. But should it appear, should this blessing befall you even in the world as it is today, and even as your life is in the condition it is today, let that experience remind you to face the source; to acknowledge the root of the power of love, which is the inner fountain of life we call self-love, compassion for our existence, and respect for the life we carry through this world, wherever we may be." --e.f.c. Planet Waves | for May 7,
2005
I knew that "smile" suggestion would earn me some
commentary. One of our readers wrote to say that anger is motivating
and authentic, and that telling the truth and offering fewer phony smiles
seemed a more appropriate response to the world we live in today. With
thanks for her comments, I say ... she's right [unless the smile is genuine
-- so don't try handing out smiles unless they're genuine] ... and, by the
way, I wouldn't advise telling the truth [as you see it] to
someone, either, unless you've come to peace within
yourself.
Why not, when righteous indignation and anger is
what we're feeling? Because it doesn't work -- because if our truth
is perceived as an attack, the person we're telling our truth to won't hear
it. And it will always be perceived as an
attack.
It's a sucker punch of an idea, this need to vent our
spleen on the person [insert other options here: the bureaucracy; the
politician; the nation; yadda...] no matter how well deserved the rant --
because no attack, no accusation is ever met with anything but a quick
defense. [When was the last time you spewed out a condemnation on someone
and they said, "My God! You're RIGHT!"]
That is the way of mortal man ... and the ramifications can be as slight as
resentment [which is extremely toxic] or as lethal as
violence.
Course in Miracles says that
the only way to come to cooperation, to collaboration, is to stop that
attack/defend loop. We can only do that if we begin to see ourselves and
our response as part of the problem and look for solutions within
ourselves. It's quite an experiment, to say the least. We start
by no longer defending ourselves -- by no longer attacking or projecting our
fears out on one another -- by finding our commonalities -- by practicing
love for all of our brothers and sisters, and for ourselves.
Yes, healing our "us v. them"
programming involves a lot of introspection and patience. It takes a
lot of practice not to defend ourselves -- a lot of tongue biting and
self-edit. It takes a lot of courage not to accuse someone -- a lot of
self-evaluation to see our part in the situation. It takes a lot of
insight to see commonality in someone we aren't happy with -- even
humility. And practicing love for all humanity? Well, that's a
Divine project, moment to moment.
Sounds like a lot of work to find a
new way to deal with anger, yes? It is. It's the goal of a
lifetime -- or many, perhaps. But that is the way to peace,
personally and globally -- we already know what doesn't
work. Just look around, read the news, see the attack/defend loop getting
tighter and harder to break. How can we find any peace when we have made so
many the enemy?
Anger is real, it demands a response --
but aiming our anger at someone only escallates the grievance, so we need
to find ways to express it without harming others. When the anger is
released -- in letters we don't send, journaling, talking to a
non-judgmental confidant, kicking the waste basket -- it doesn't feel quite
so compelling, so dark. It doesn't drive us to attack -- it doesn't require
us to defend ... it's simply what we feel.
That is the point where we can try it another way, just
to see what happens -- no phony smiles, just real ones -- no accusations or
judgments, but rather, dialogues and collaborations. It's not all that hard
to see the perks of such a notion:
The day we define an enemy is the same day we start
a war -- in our homes, our workplace, our world.
The day we define a friend, cooperation begins -- on
that day, we invite in our Higher Angels.
Or -- to put it another way[s]:
Kindness is the light that dissolves all walls
between souls, families, and nations.
~ Paramahansa Yogananda Overcome the angry by non-anger; overcome the wicked by goodness; overcome the miser by generosity; overcome the liar by truth. ~ The Buddha, Dhammapada 223 "The antidote to hatred in the heart, the source of
violence, is tolerance. Tolerance is an important virtue of bodhisattvas
[enlightened heroes and heroines] -- it enables you to refrain from reacting
angrily to the harm inflicted on you by others. You could call this practice
"inner disarmament," in that a well-developed tolerance makes you free from the
compulsion to counterattack. For the same reason, we also call tolerance the
"best armor," since it protects you from being conquered by hatred
itself."
~ Dalai Lama
"War's gifts may prove bitter and empty in the end,
but that hasn't eroded the groove of war in our minds. Today, after a century in
which more than 100 million people died from war, we survivors still turn to war
because we think it does some good. The satisfaction of waging war cannot be
replaced by philosophy or religion. The Buddha and the Prince of Peace could not
have spoken out more strongly against violence, yet their beliefs have been
distorted into a cause for bloodshed at the hands of their
followers."
~ Deepak Chopra We must be the change we wish to see in the
world.
~ Ghandi With thanks to more of my hero's, above, who get the
last word today --
Peace ~
Jude
Why
Peace Begins With You
Seven spiritual practices for bringing peace into your life and the world around you. http://www.beliefnet.com/story/160/story_16073_1.html
The Dalai Lama's Statement on Iraq http://www.atc.org.au/news/news/20030320_hhdlnowariraq.html |